Institution route · Sovereign and public sector
The decision is on Tuesday. The stress run finishes on Thursday.
A port closes, a grid node fails, a currency moves, a counterparty defaults. SAA connects physical, infrastructure, macro and market evidence into one governed surface that runs inside your perimeter and seals every result for replay.
Founder-direct intake · NDA before data · review-grade evidence
Four pressures the decision room feels first.
Public-sector risk is operational before it becomes financial. The page is built around the meeting window, the audit trail and the claim boundary.
The answer arrives after the decision.
Pain. National stress analysis is a batch job owned by different departments. Crisis windows are measured in hours.
SAA. A deterministic compute core returns a full stress surface inside the meeting, on your own hardware.
The number cannot be reproduced.
Pain. The figure that justified an intervention has to survive an audit, a parliamentary question and a press cycle.
SAA. Every run is sealed with its input snapshot and manifest. Re-execution returns the identical result byte for byte.
Physical events become fiscal exposure.
Pain. A hospital system, port, grid or supply corridor fails. The cost lands on the state balance sheet through channels no single ministry owns.
SAA. Physical-to-financial cascade mapping across national, city and institution level, with each link sourced.
Nobody wrote down what could not be said.
Pain. Public decisions are attacked at their weakest claim. One overstatement can discredit twenty correct pages.
SAA. Fail-closed output states WITHHELD, names the failed pillar and gives the unlock path.
Physical-to-financial cascade
National trigger. Institutional exposure. One replayable path.
Screen shown is a review-only surface. Figures are illustrative; the evidence object carries snapshot, status and replay path.
Physical-to-financial cascade, national to institution level. Review-only surface; illustrative figures.
Apply the surface across four working lanes.
Each lane is designed for a real owner: national-risk teams, debt offices, central-bank units, supervisors and public oversight teams.
See the country posture change
Macro, FX, liquidity, debt and rates context with source-backed updates and data-vintage stamps.
Trace the cascade before it is fiscal
Critical nodes, physical triggers and dependency paths from infrastructure to budget exposure.
Challenge the model that sets policy
Independent recomputation of a supervisory or internal model, with dissent recorded rather than averaged away.
Hand the committee a file it can verify
Decision packet with provenance, claim boundary and replay instruction, ready for audit and oversight.
ARIN records disagreement. KOKON traces public money and time.
For public-sector work, governance is not decoration. It is the difference between a number that can be defended and a number that becomes a political liability.
ARIN
Twenty-two specialists. One accountable answer.
Public decisions are not attacked only on their conclusion. They are attacked on the question that was never asked. ARIN runs an independent council of specialist reviewers over the same evidence, and the Governor produces one answer with disagreement preserved.
KOKON
Where public money and public time actually go.
A national budget leaks in ordinary places: duplicated payments, procurement split just under approval thresholds, auto-renewing contracts and processes where waiting time exceeds working time. KOKON maps these as structural patterns and separates data evidence from legal accusation.
Evidence, not testimonials.
Public-sector credibility comes from reproducible evidence, not customer-logo theatre. The strongest proof is the object your reviewer can replay.
DRCET method papers
Published and deliberately unpatented method discipline for proving that a fast risk engine returns the Monte Carlo answer.
See methodology →Replay pack on every result
Each result carries input snapshot, manifest, canonical output and replay instruction. The point is verification without trusting us.
Review security →Independence Charter
No exclusivity, no white label, no claim stronger than the evidence can replay. Prior versions remain part of the public record.
Read charter →Built on the NVIDIA stack. NVIDIA Inception and Innovation Lab member; validated on H100 class systems. Program memberships; no endorsement implied.
Four questions worth asking any risk vendor, including us.
These are uncomfortable questions. That is why they belong on the public page.
Can the number be reproduced by someone who does not trust you, without access to your code?
Where does our data physically sit while it is being computed, and who can read it?
What does your system do when the evidence is insufficient: does it estimate, or does it refuse?
When your model disagrees with itself, do we see the disagreement or the average?
Our answers are on this page. Ask the same of anyone else in the room.
The boundary ships with the claim.
Public-sector outputs are analytical evidence only. The decision, and the authority for it, remain with the institution.
Founder-direct intake
Bring one public-risk workflow.
One workflow, one exposure, one evidence question. We map the data, the owner, the proof path and the boundary of what may be claimed, before any production use.